Abstract:
This study is a comparative analysis of the survival strategies of two regimes: Jordan''s King Hussein and Lebanon''s Fu''ad Shihab. It is an exploration of the domestic determinants of foreign policy behaviour, and the relation between foreign policy behaviour and regime consolidation, legitimation, and survival in small, weak state actors located in a permeable regional system. The study advances an hypothesis of four explanatory variables to explain the success and failure of Hussein and Shihab''s respective strategies. Husseinism''s ''success''--as opposed to Shihabism''s ''failure''--may be explained by a successful insulatory regional policy, the historical process of state formation, the availability of economic resources under state control, and the ability of the state to use its coercive resources without hindrance. This enabled the Hashemite regime to restructure state-society relations to consolidate social control, mitigate the effects of trans-national ideologies on the domestic arena, and achieve an acceptable level of national integration among the different segments of the society gaining the state allegiance from a sizeable number, or from strategic sectors, of the population.
Citation:
Salloukh, B. F. (1994). The King and the General: Survival Strategies in Jordan and Lebanon (Doctoral dissertation, McGill University Libraries).
