dc.contributor.author |
Wazne, Mahmoud |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Chrysochoou, Maria |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dermatas, Dimitris |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Moon, Doek Hyun |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Christodoulatos, Christos |
|
dc.contributor.author |
French, Chris |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Morris, John |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kaouris, Maria |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-07-27T06:48:15Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-07-27T06:48:15Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2017 |
en_US |
dc.date.issued |
2017-08-10 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1546-962X |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/5967 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Barium addition to chromite ore processing residue COPR was investigated in order to
address a the pronounced heaving phenomena that are associated with mainly the presence of ettringite
and b hexavalent chromium leaching. Sulfate was added to representative samples of grey-black GB
and hard-brown HB COPR to simulate worst-case conditions of sulfate influx and ettringite formation.
Both the X-ray powder diffraction XRPD and the modeling results showed that ettringite is a thermodynamically
favored reaction in COPR. The subsequent addition of barium lead to the formation of both barite
and barium chromate, observed as solid solution between the two phases. Modeling results confirmed that
barium sulfate is the more stable species that will dissolve ettringite and that barium chromate will also
dissolve COPR chromate phases when sulfate is depleted. The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
TCLP test on GB samples showed that the optimal stoichiometry to maintain Cr and Ba TCLP concentrations
below the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulatory limit of 5 and 100 ppm, respectively,
lies between 1:1 Ba to sulfate plus chromate ratio and 1.5:1. The respective optimal stoichiometry for the
HB COPR was found to be higher, between 2:1 and 5:1. Considering that COPR is actually a Crcontaminated
cement form, a further area of research is the identification of barium-containing wastes i.e.,
heavy-metal sludges, contaminated soils, etc. that would be suitable for combination with COPR; in this
way, an environmentally sustainable yet cost-effective treatment application can be realized. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.title |
Investigation of barium treatment of chromite ore processing residue |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.description.version |
Published |
en_US |
dc.author.school |
SOE |
en_US |
dc.author.idnumber |
201205627 |
en_US |
dc.author.department |
Civil Engineering |
en_US |
dc.description.embargo |
N/A |
en_US |
dc.relation.journal |
Journal of ASTM International |
en_US |
dc.journal.volume |
3 |
en_US |
dc.journal.issue |
6 |
en_US |
dc.article.pages |
165-175 |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
COPR |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Chromate |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Hexavalent chromium |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Ettringite |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Heaving |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Barium |
en_US |
dc.identifier.ctation |
Chrysochoou, M., Dermatas, D., Moon, D. H., Christodoulatos, C., Wazne, M., French, C., ... & Kaouris, M. (2006). Investigation of barium treatment of chromite ore processing residue (COPR). In Contaminated Sediments: Evaluation and Remediation Techniques. ASTM International. |
en_US |
dc.author.email |
mahmoud.wazne@lau.edu.lb |
en_US |
dc.identifier.tou |
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php |
en_US |
dc.identifier.url |
https://compass.astm.org/download/STP37685S.32648.pdf |
en_US |
dc.author.affiliation |
Lebanese American University |
en_US |