Limit states design in geotechnical engineering practice

LAUR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Foye, Kevin Christopher
dc.contributor.author Abou-Jaoude, Grace
dc.contributor.author Salgado, Rodrigo
dc.date.accessioned 2017-06-20T10:23:29Z
dc.date.available 2017-06-20T10:23:29Z
dc.date.issued 2017-06-20
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10725/5803
dc.description.abstract Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) shows promise as a viable alternative to the present working stress design (WSD) approach to foundation design. The key improvements of LRFD over the traditional Working Stress Design (WSD) are the ability to provide a more consistent level of reliability and the possibility of accounting for load and resistance uncertainties separately. In order for foundation design to be consistent with current structural design practice, the use of the same loads, load factors and load combinations would be required. In this study, we review the load factors presented in various LRFD Codes from the US, Canada and Europe. A simple firstorder second moment (FOSM) reliability analysis is presented to determine appropriate ranges for the values of the load factors. These values are compared with those proposed in the Codes. The comparisons between the analysis and the Codes show that the values of load factors given in the Codes generally fall within ranges consistent with the results of the FOSM analysis. For LRFD to gain acceptance in geotechnical engineering, a framework for the objective assessment of resistance factors is needed. Such a framework, based on reliability analysis is proposed in this study. Probability Density Functions (PDFs), representing design variable uncertainties, are required for analysis. A systematic approach to the selection of PDFs is presented. Such a procedure is a critical prerequisite to a rational probabilistic analysis in the development of LRFD methods in geotechnical engineering. Additionally, in order for LRFD to fulfill its promise for designs with more consistent reliability, the methods used to execute a design must be consistent with the methods assumed in the development of the LRFD factors. In this study, a methodology for the estimation of soil parameters for use in design equations is proposed that should allow for more statistical consistency in design inputs than is possible in traditional methods. Resistance factor values are dependent upon the values of load factors used. Thus, a method to adjust the resistance factors to account for code-specified load factors is also presented. Resistance factors for ultimate bearing capacity are computed using reliability analysis for shallow and deep foundations both in sand and in clay, for use with both ASCE-7 (1996) and AASHTO (1998) load factors. The various considered methods obtain their input parameters from the CPT, the SPT, or laboratory testing. Designers may wish to use design methods that are not considered in this study. As such, the designer needs the capability to select resistance factors that reflect the uncertainty of the design method chosen. A methodology is proposed in this study to accomplish this task, in a way that is consistent with the framework. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Purdue University
dc.title Limit states design in geotechnical engineering practice en_US
dc.type Book / Chapter of a Book en_US
dc.description.version Published en_US
dc.author.school SOE en_US
dc.author.idnumber 200702670 en_US
dc.author.department Civil Engineering en_US
dc.description.embargo N/A en_US
dc.description.physdesc vii, 229 p. ill.
dc.publication.place West Lafayette, Indiana
dc.keywords Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD)
dc.keywords Geotechnical Engineering
dc.keywords Foundation Design, in-situ testing
dc.keywords Reliability-Based Design (RBD)
dc.keywords Probability
dc.description.bibliographiccitations Includes bibliographical references.
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284313262
dc.identifier.ctation Foye, K.C., Abou-Jaoude, G., and Salgado, R. “Limit States Design (LSD) for Shallow and Deep Foundations. en_US
dc.author.email grace.aboujaoude@lau.edu.lb en_US
dc.identifier.tou http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php en_US
dc.identifier.url https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jtrp/139/ en_US
dc.note Joint Transportation Research Program Technical Reports; FHWA/IN/JTRP-2004/21
dc.orcid.id https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1992-1611
dc.publication.date 2004
dc.author.affiliation Lebanese American University en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search LAUR

Advanced Search


My Account