dc.contributor.author |
Ramadan, Wijdan H. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Khreis, Noura A. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kabbara, Wissam K. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-10-03T09:22:09Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-10-03T09:22:09Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2015 |
en_US |
dc.date.issued |
2016-10-03 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1177-889X |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4486 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Background
The aim of the study was to evaluate the simplicity, safety, patients’ preference, and convenience of the administration of insulin using the pen device versus the conventional vial/syringe in patients with diabetes.
Methods
This observational study was conducted in multiple community pharmacies in Lebanon. The investigators interviewed patients with diabetes using an insulin pen or conventional vial/syringe. A total of 74 questionnaires were filled over a period of 6 months. Answers were entered into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software and Excel spreadsheet. t-test, logistic regression analysis, and correlation analysis were used in order to analyze the results.
Results
A higher percentage of patients from the insulin pen users group (95.2%) found the method easy to use as compared to only 46.7% of the insulin conventional users group (P 0.001, relative risk [RR]: 2.041, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.178–3.535). Moreover, 61.9% and 26.7% of pen users and conventional users, respectively, could read the scale easily (P 0.037, RR 2.321, 95% CI: 0.940–5.731), while 85.7% of pen users found it more convenient shifting to pen and 86.7% of the conventional users would want to shift to pen if it had the same cost. Pain perception was statistically different between the groups. A much higher percentage (76.2%) of pen users showed no pain during injection compared to only 26.7% of conventional users (P 0.003, RR 2.857, 95% CI: 1.194–6.838).
Conclusion
The insulin pen was significantly much easier to use and less painful than the conventional vial/syringe. Proper education on the methods of administration/storage and disposal of needles/syringes is needed in both groups. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.title |
Simplicity, safety, and acceptability of insulin pen use versus the conventional vial/syringe device in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Lebanon |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.description.version |
Published |
en_US |
dc.author.school |
SOP |
en_US |
dc.author.idnumber |
200104485 |
en_US |
dc.author.department |
Pharmacy Practice Department |
en_US |
dc.description.embargo |
N/A |
en_US |
dc.relation.journal |
Patient Preference and Adherence |
en_US |
dc.journal.volume |
2015 |
en_US |
dc.journal.issue |
9 |
en_US |
dc.article.pages |
517-528 |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Diabetes |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Insulin pen |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Conventional vial/syringe |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Hypoglycemia |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Secretagogue |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Pain perception |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Needle phobia |
en_US |
dc.identifier.doi |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S78225 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.ctation |
Ramadan, W. H., Khreis, N. A., & Kabbara, W. K. (2015). Simplicity, safety, and acceptability of insulin pen use versus the conventional vial/syringe device in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Lebanon. Patient preference and adherence, 9, 517. |
en_US |
dc.author.email |
wissam.kabbara@lau.edu.lb |
en_US |
dc.identifier.tou |
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php |
en_US |
dc.identifier.url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4383149/ |
en_US |
dc.orcid.id |
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7310-9192 |
en_US |