.

Simplicity, safety, and acceptability of insulin pen use versus the conventional vial/syringe device in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Lebanon

LAUR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ramadan, Wijdan H.
dc.contributor.author Khreis, Noura A.
dc.contributor.author Kabbara, Wissam K.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-03T09:22:09Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-03T09:22:09Z
dc.date.copyright 2015 en_US
dc.date.issued 2016-10-03
dc.identifier.issn 1177-889X en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4486
dc.description.abstract Background The aim of the study was to evaluate the simplicity, safety, patients’ preference, and convenience of the administration of insulin using the pen device versus the conventional vial/syringe in patients with diabetes. Methods This observational study was conducted in multiple community pharmacies in Lebanon. The investigators interviewed patients with diabetes using an insulin pen or conventional vial/syringe. A total of 74 questionnaires were filled over a period of 6 months. Answers were entered into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software and Excel spreadsheet. t-test, logistic regression analysis, and correlation analysis were used in order to analyze the results. Results A higher percentage of patients from the insulin pen users group (95.2%) found the method easy to use as compared to only 46.7% of the insulin conventional users group (P 0.001, relative risk [RR]: 2.041, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.178–3.535). Moreover, 61.9% and 26.7% of pen users and conventional users, respectively, could read the scale easily (P 0.037, RR 2.321, 95% CI: 0.940–5.731), while 85.7% of pen users found it more convenient shifting to pen and 86.7% of the conventional users would want to shift to pen if it had the same cost. Pain perception was statistically different between the groups. A much higher percentage (76.2%) of pen users showed no pain during injection compared to only 26.7% of conventional users (P 0.003, RR 2.857, 95% CI: 1.194–6.838). Conclusion The insulin pen was significantly much easier to use and less painful than the conventional vial/syringe. Proper education on the methods of administration/storage and disposal of needles/syringes is needed in both groups. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title Simplicity, safety, and acceptability of insulin pen use versus the conventional vial/syringe device in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Lebanon en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.version Published en_US
dc.author.school SOP en_US
dc.author.idnumber 200104485 en_US
dc.author.department Pharmacy Practice Department en_US
dc.description.embargo N/A en_US
dc.relation.journal Patient Preference and Adherence en_US
dc.journal.volume 2015 en_US
dc.journal.issue 9 en_US
dc.article.pages 517-528 en_US
dc.keywords Diabetes en_US
dc.keywords Insulin pen en_US
dc.keywords Conventional vial/syringe en_US
dc.keywords Hypoglycemia en_US
dc.keywords Secretagogue en_US
dc.keywords Pain perception en_US
dc.keywords Needle phobia en_US
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S78225 en_US
dc.identifier.ctation Ramadan, W. H., Khreis, N. A., & Kabbara, W. K. (2015). Simplicity, safety, and acceptability of insulin pen use versus the conventional vial/syringe device in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Lebanon. Patient preference and adherence, 9, 517. en_US
dc.author.email wissam.kabbara@lau.edu.lb en_US
dc.identifier.tou http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php en_US
dc.identifier.url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4383149/ en_US
dc.orcid.id https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7310-9192 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search LAUR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account