| dc.contributor.author |
Azar, Riad R. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Bill, Jason |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Mullady, Daniel |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Murad, Faris |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Early, Dayna S. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Edmundowicz, Steven A. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Kushnir, Vladimir M. |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2016-09-29T13:19:29Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2016-09-29T13:19:29Z |
|
| dc.date.copyright |
2014 |
en_US |
| dc.date.issued |
2016-09-29 |
|
| dc.identifier.issn |
0016-5107 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4459 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
ERCP is currently the method of choice for the postoperative evaluation of suspected bile duct stones seen on IOC. The false positive rate of IOC has ranged widely in prior studies, from 2-60% and it is unclear whether there are specific predictors that could be used risk stratify patients to undergo postoperative ERCP vs. less invasive diagnostic testing. |
en_US |
| dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC) |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
| dc.description.version |
Published |
en_US |
| dc.title.subtitle |
Should Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Be the Initial Study of Choice? |
en_US |
| dc.author.school |
SOM |
en_US |
| dc.author.idnumber |
200902767 |
en_US |
| dc.author.department |
N/A |
en_US |
| dc.description.embargo |
N/A |
en_US |
| dc.relation.journal |
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
en_US |
| dc.journal.volume |
79 |
en_US |
| dc.journal.issue |
5, Suppl. |
en_US |
| dc.article.pages |
AB352 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.389 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.ctation |
Bill, J., Mullady, D., Murad, F., Azar, R. R., Easler, J. J., Early, D. S., & Kushnir, V. M. (2014). Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC): Should Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Be the Initial Study of Choice?. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 79(5), AB352. |
en_US |
| dc.author.email |
riad.azar@lau.edu.lb |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.tou |
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.url |
http://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(14)00559-8/abstract |
en_US |