.

Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor

LAUR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Azar, Riad R.
dc.contributor.author Kushnir, Vladimir M.
dc.contributor.author Keswani, Rajesh N.
dc.contributor.author Hollander, Thomas G.
dc.contributor.author Kohlmeier, Cara
dc.contributor.author Mullady, Daniel K.
dc.contributor.author Murad, Faris M.
dc.contributor.author Komanduri, Srinadh
dc.contributor.author Edmundowicz, Steven A.
dc.contributor.author Early, Dayna S.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-09-28T11:55:25Z
dc.date.available 2016-09-28T11:55:25Z
dc.date.copyright 2015 en_US
dc.date.issued 2016-09-28
dc.identifier.issn 0016-5107 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4439
dc.description.abstract Background American Gastroenterological Association guidelines recommend performing EUS to characterize subepithelial lesions (SELs) discovered on upper endoscopy (EGD), followed by surveillance if no high-risk features are identified. However, limited data are available on the impact of and compliance with surveillance recommendations. Objective To determine the natural history of SELs < 30 mm in size evaluated by EUS and to determine the degree of patient compliance with surveillance recommendations. Design Prospective registry. Setting Two tertiary centers. Patients We studied 187 consecutive adult patients referred for EUS evaluation of foregut SELs. Main Outcome Measurements Proportion of patients in whom SELs change in size or echo-features and compliance with follow-up recommendations. Results Surveillance was recommended in 65 patients with hypoechoic SELs (44.6% women, age 59.5 ± 13.2 years); of these, 29 (44.6%) underwent surveillance EUS as recommended and were followed for a median of 30 months (range, 12-105). During follow-up, 16 SELs (25%) increased in size, with a mean increase of 3.4 ± 3.9 mm (range, 1-15). No changes in echo-texture of the SELs were observed. One patient was referred to surgery during follow-up (because of SEL growth > 30 mm). Limitations Short follow-up duration; compliance was a secondary aim. Conclusions During a median follow-up of 30 months, growth in size was observed in 25% of small foregut SELs. However, change in size was minimal, and only 1 patient was referred for surgery based on surveillance EUS findings. Compliance with surveillance recommendations is poor, with fewer than 50% of patients undergoing surveillance EUS as recommended. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.version Published en_US
dc.title.subtitle results of a prospective multicenter study en_US
dc.author.school SOM en_US
dc.author.idnumber 200902767 en_US
dc.author.department N/A en_US
dc.description.embargo N/A en_US
dc.relation.journal Gastrointestinal Endoscopy en_US
dc.journal.volume 81 en_US
dc.journal.issue 6 en_US
dc.article.pages 1378-1384 en_US
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.013 en_US
dc.identifier.ctation Kushnir, V. M., Keswani, R. N., Hollander, T. G., Kohlmeier, C., Mullady, D. K., Azar, R. R., ... & Early, D. S. (2015). Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor: results of a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 81(6), 1378-1384. en_US
dc.author.email riad.azar@lau.edu.lb en_US
dc.identifier.tou http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php en_US
dc.identifier.url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510714024134 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search LAUR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account