dc.contributor.author |
Azar, Riad R. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Coté, Gregory A. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mullady, Daniel K. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Jonnalagadda, Sreenivasa S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Keswani, Rajesh N. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wani, Sachin B. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hovis, Christine E. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ammar, Tarek |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-09-19T11:30:50Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-09-19T11:30:50Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2012 |
en_US |
dc.date.issued |
2016-09-19 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0163-2116 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4311 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Background and Study Aims
Among cases of difficult biliary cannulation, alternatives include use of a pancreatic duct stent (PDS) or guidewire (PDW) to facilitate access. We compared the effectiveness of a PDS versus a PDW to facilitate common bile duct (CBD) cannulation.
Patients and Methods
We conducted a randomized, crossover trial at two endoscopy referral centers, limited to patients undergoing ERCP without a history of biliary sphincterotomy. After meeting predefined criteria for difficult cannulation, patients were randomized to using a PDS or PDW to facilitate CBD cannulation. Outcomes included cannulation rate within 6 min, overall cannulation rate, frequency of precut, and complication rates.
Results
Among 442 eligible patients, 87 (19.7 %) met criteria for difficult cannulation. Forty two were randomized to PDW, 54 to PDS (including 9 PDW patients crossed over to PDS). The rate of CBD cannulation within 6 min was similar in the PDW (38.1 %) and PDS (51.9 %) groups (p = 0.18). In a secondary analysis limited to patients who successfully underwent PDW or PDS deployment, the rate was also comparable (PDW 59.3 %, PDS 65.1 %; p = 0.62). The overall frequency of CBD cannulation was 66.7 % in PDW and 90.7 % in PDS patients. Precut was required in 9.5 % of PDW and 25.9 % of PDS patients. Complication rates were similar, with 4 (4.6 %) patients having post-ERCP pancreatitis and 1 (1.1 %) having post-ERCP pain without confirmation of pancreatitis.
Conclusions
Use of a PDS or PDW facilitates CBD cannulation while maintaining a low complication rate and reducing the need for precut sphincterotomy in the majority of cases. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.title |
Use of a pancreatic duct stent or guidewire facilitates bile duct access with low rates of precut sphincterotomy |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.description.version |
Published |
en_US |
dc.title.subtitle |
a randomized clinical trial |
en_US |
dc.author.school |
SOM |
en_US |
dc.author.idnumber |
200902767 |
en_US |
dc.author.department |
N/A |
en_US |
dc.description.embargo |
N/A |
en_US |
dc.relation.journal |
Digestive Diseases and Sciences |
en_US |
dc.journal.volume |
57 |
en_US |
dc.journal.issue |
12 |
en_US |
dc.article.pages |
3271–3278 |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Cannulation |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
ERCP |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Stent |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Bile duct |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Endoscopy |
en_US |
dc.identifier.doi |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2269-2 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.ctation |
Coté, G. A., Mullady, D. K., Jonnalagadda, S. S., Keswani, R. N., Wani, S. B., Hovis, C. E., ... & Azar, R. R. (2012). Use of a pancreatic duct stent or guidewire facilitates bile duct access with low rates of precut sphincterotomy: a randomized clinical trial. Digestive diseases and sciences, 57(12), 3271-3278. |
en_US |
dc.author.email |
riad.azar@lau.edu.lb |
en_US |
dc.identifier.tou |
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php |
en_US |
dc.identifier.url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10620-012-2269-2 |
en_US |