dc.contributor.author |
Azar, Riad |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Early, Dayna S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Janec, Eileen |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ristvedt, Stephen |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Gao, Feng |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Edmundowicz, Steven A. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-06-22T08:42:30Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-06-22T08:42:30Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2006 |
en_US |
dc.date.issued |
2016-06-22 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0016-5107 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4124 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Background
There are no clear guidelines regarding the best way, in terms of timing and setting, to deliver results to patients who undergo EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) of suspected pancreatic masses.
Objective
We aimed to study (1) whether patients undergoing EUS-FNA prefer to receive preliminary results immediately after the procedure or at a later date, after final results are known; and (2) to assess the accuracy of patients' recollection of information given to them regarding their FNA diagnosis.
Design
We enrolled patients presenting to our endoscopy center for EUS-FNA of suspected pancreatic masses and obtained data through 4 pilot surveys.
Settings
University-based endoscopy center.
Patients
Sixty patients who were referred for EUS-FNA of suspected pancreatic masses.
Results
A total of 57 of 59 patients (96.6%) wanted preliminary results the same day as the procedure. Twenty-eight of 60 (42.7%) knew they were having a biopsy, and 42 of 60 (70%) knew cancer was suspected. Of those who received preliminary results, 31 of 41 (75%) remembered the diagnosis correctly the next day, and 32 of 38 (84%) remembered the diagnosis correctly 1 week later.
Limitations
Single-center pilot study.
Conclusions
The majority of our patients wished to receive preliminary results the same day as the procedure. Although most patients remembered results correctly, 25% of patients did not remember the correct diagnosis the next day. Further work is needed to improve patient's understanding of the reasons for the EUS-FNA and recall of preliminary EUS-FNA results. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.title |
Patient preference and recall of results of EUS-guided FNA |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.description.version |
Published |
en_US |
dc.author.school |
SOM |
en_US |
dc.author.idnumber |
200902767 |
en_US |
dc.author.department |
N/A |
en_US |
dc.description.embargo |
N/A |
en_US |
dc.relation.journal |
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
en_US |
dc.journal.volume |
64 |
en_US |
dc.journal.issue |
5 |
en_US |
dc.article.pages |
735-739.e4 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.doi |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.087 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.ctation |
Early, D. S., Janec, E., Azar, R., Ristvedt, S., Gao, F., & Edmundowicz, S. A. (2006). Patient preference and recall of results of EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 64(5), 735-739. |
en_US |
dc.author.email |
riad.azar@lau.edu.lb |
en_US |
dc.identifier.tou |
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php |
en_US |
dc.identifier.url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510706024941 |
en_US |