.

Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts

LAUR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Azar, Riad
dc.contributor.author Melman, Lora
dc.contributor.author Beddow, Kathleen
dc.contributor.author Brunt, L. Michael
dc.contributor.author Halpin, Valerie J.
dc.contributor.author Eagon, J. Christopher
dc.date.accessioned 2016-06-21T06:07:42Z
dc.date.available 2016-06-21T06:07:42Z
dc.date.copyright 2009 en_US
dc.date.issued 2016-06-21
dc.identifier.issn 0930-2794 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4112
dc.description.abstract Background Internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts can be accomplished by traditional open or minimally invasive laparoscopic or endoscopic approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the primary and overall success rates and clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Methods Records of 83 patients undergoing laparoscopic (n = 16), endoscopic (n = 45), and open (n = 22) pancreatic cystgastrostomy were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results There were no significant differences (p < 0.05) in the mean patient age (years), gender, body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2), etiology of pancreatitis (% gallstone), or size (cm) of pancreatic pseudocyst between the groups. Grade 2 or greater complications occurred within 30 days of the primary procedure for 31.5% of the laparoscopic patients, 15.6% of the endoscopic patients, and 22.7% of the open patients (nonsignificant differences). The follow-up evaluation for 75 patients (90.4%) was performed at a mean interval of 9.5 months (range, 1–40 months). The primary compared with the overall success rate, defined as cyst resolution, was 51.1% vs. 84.6% for the endoscopic group, 87.5% vs. 93.8% for the laparoscopic group, and 81.2% vs. 90.9% for the open group. The primary success rate was significantly higher (p < 0.01) for laparoscopic and open groups than for the endoscopic group, but the overall success rate was equivalent across the groups (nonsignificant differences). Primary endoscopic failures were salvaged by open pancreatic cystgastrostomy (n = 13), percutaneous drainage (n = 3), and repeat endoscopic drainage (n = 6). Conclusions Laparoscopic and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy both have a higher primary success rate than endoscopic internal drainage, although repeat endoscopic cystgastrostomy provides overall success for selected patients. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.version Published en_US
dc.author.school SOM en_US
dc.author.idnumber 200902767 en_US
dc.author.department N/A en_US
dc.description.embargo N/A en_US
dc.relation.journal Surgical Endoscopy en_US
dc.journal.volume 23 en_US
dc.journal.issue 2 en_US
dc.article.pages 267-271 en_US
dc.keywords Pancreatic pseudocyst en_US
dc.keywords Cystgastrostomy en_US
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0196-2 en_US
dc.identifier.ctation Melman, L., Azar, R., Beddow, K., Brunt, L. M., Halpin, V. J., Eagon, J. C., ... & Matthews, B. D. (2009). Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Surgical endoscopy, 23(2), 267-271. en_US
dc.author.email riad.azar@lau.edu.lb en_US
dc.identifier.tou http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php en_US
dc.identifier.url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-008-0196-2 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search LAUR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account