.

Incidence of Sedation-Related Complications With Propofol Use During Advanced Endoscopic Procedures

LAUR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Azar, Riad
dc.contributor.author Cote, Gregory A.
dc.contributor.author Hovis, Robert M.
dc.contributor.author Ansstas, Michael A.
dc.contributor.author Waldbaum, Lawrence
dc.contributor.author Early, Dayna S.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-06-20T08:20:59Z
dc.date.available 2016-06-20T08:20:59Z
dc.date.copyright 2010 en_US
dc.date.issued 2016-06-20
dc.identifier.issn 1542-3565 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4104
dc.description.abstract Background & Aims Propofol is an effective sedative in advanced endoscopy. However, the incidence of sedation-related complications is unclear. We sought to define the frequency of sedation-related adverse events, particularly the rate of airway modifications (AMs), with propofol use during advanced endoscopy. We also evaluated independent predictors of AMs. Methods Patients undergoing sedation with propofol for advanced endoscopic procedures, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasound, and small-bowel enteroscopy, were studied prospectively. Sedative dosing was determined by a certified registered nurse anesthetist with the goal of achieving deep sedation. Sedation-related complications included AMs, hypoxemia (pulse oximetry [SpO2] < 90%), hypotension requiring vasopressors, and early procedure termination. AMs were defined as chin lift, modified face mask ventilation, and nasal airway. We performed a regression analysis to compare characteristics of patients requiring AMs (AM+) with those who did not (AM−). Results A total of 799 patients were enrolled over 7 months. Procedures included endoscopic ultrasound (423), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (336), and small-bowel enteroscopy (40). A total of 87.2% of patients showed no response to endoscopic intubation. Hypoxemia occurred in 12.8%, hypotension in 0.5%, and premature termination in 0.6% of the patients. No patients required bag-mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation. There were 154 AMs performed in 115 (14.4%) patients, including chin lift (12.1%), modified face mask ventilation (3.6%), and nasal airway (3.5%). Body mass index, male sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class of 3 or higher were independent predictors of AMs. Conclusions Propofol can be used safely for advanced endoscopic procedures when administered by a trained professional. Independent predictors of AMs included male sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class of 3 or higher, and increased body mass index. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title Incidence of Sedation-Related Complications With Propofol Use During Advanced Endoscopic Procedures en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.version Published en_US
dc.author.school SOM en_US
dc.author.idnumber 200902767 en_US
dc.author.department N/A en_US
dc.description.embargo N/A en_US
dc.relation.journal Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology en_US
dc.journal.volume 8 en_US
dc.journal.issue 2 en_US
dc.article.pages 137-142 en_US
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.008 en_US
dc.identifier.ctation Coté, G. A., Hovis, R. M., Ansstas, M. A., Waldbaum, L., Azar, R. R., Early, D. S., ... & Jonnalagadda, S. S. (2010). Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 8(2), 137-142. en_US
dc.author.email riad.azar@lau.edu.lb en_US
dc.identifier.tou http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php en_US
dc.identifier.url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356509006569 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search LAUR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account