Debating Lebanon's Power-Sharing Model

LAUR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Fakhoury, Tamirace
dc.date.accessioned 2016-03-21T13:32:49Z
dc.date.available 2016-03-21T13:32:49Z
dc.date.copyright 2014
dc.date.issued 2016-03-21
dc.identifier.issn 1083-4753 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10725/3378
dc.description.abstract The terms power sharing, consociational democracy, and consociationalism10 are used inter- changeably in consociational literature to categorize the Lebanese situation. [...]alternative expressions such as "political pluralism," "political confessionalism," or "political sectarianism"11 offer scholars whose primary research focuses on Lebanon heuristic tools with which to describe how the consociational method has been reappropriated in the Lebanese case. According to one dominant perspective, Lebanese sectarian communities are the "boundary markers" in Lebanon's "social stratifica- tion"13 as well as the building blocks structuring political relations. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title Debating Lebanon's Power-Sharing Model en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.version Published en_US
dc.title.subtitle Opportunity for an Impasse for Democratization Sutdies in the Middle east? en_US
dc.author.school SAS en_US
dc.author.idnumber 199201310 en_US
dc.author.woa N/A en_US
dc.author.department Social Sciences en_US
dc.description.embargo N/A en_US
dc.relation.journal Arab Studies Journal en_US
dc.journal.volume 22 en_US
dc.journal.issue 1 en_US
dc.article.pages 230-255 en_US
dc.identifier.ctation Fakhoury, T. (2014). Debating Lebanon's Power-Sharing Model: An Opportunity or an Impasse for Democratization Studies in the Middle East?. Arab Studies Journal, 22(1), 230. en_US
dc.author.email tamirace.fakhoury@lau.edu.lb

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search LAUR

Advanced Search


My Account