dc.contributor.author |
Glazer, Evan |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Lui, Ping |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Abdalla, Eddie |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Curley, Steven |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-11-20T07:53:26Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-11-20T07:53:26Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2012 |
|
dc.date.issued |
2015-11-20 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1091-255X |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/2640 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Background
We investigated the role of neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies on survival for resectable biliary tract cancer. We hypothesized that neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy should improve the survival probability in these patients.
Methods
This was a retrospective review of a prospective database of patients resected for gallbladder cancer (GBC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC). One hundred fifty-seven patients underwent resection for primary GBC (n = 63) and CC (n = 94). Fisher’s exact test, Student’s t test, the log-rank test, and a Cox proportional hazard model determined significant differences.
Results
The 5-year overall survival rate after resection of GBC and CC was 50.6 % and 30.4 %, respectively. Of the patients, 17.8 % received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 48.7 % received adjuvant chemotherapy, while 15.8 % received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Patients with negative margins of at least 1 cm had a 5-year survival rate of 52.4 % (p < 0.01). Adjuvant therapy did not significantly prolong survival. Neoadjuvant therapy delayed surgical resection on average for 6.8 months (p < 0.0001). Immediate resection increased median survival from 42.3 to 53.5 months (p = 0.01).
Conclusions
Early surgical resection of biliary tract malignancies with 1 cm tumor-free margins provides the best probability for long-term survival. Currently available neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy does not improve survival. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.title |
Neither Neoadjuvant nor Adjuvant Therapy Increases Survival After Biliary Tract Cancer Resection with Wide Negative Margins |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.description.version |
Published |
en_US |
dc.author.school |
SOM |
en_US |
dc.author.idnumber |
201100945 |
en_US |
dc.author.woa |
N/A |
en_US |
dc.author.department |
N/A |
en_US |
dc.description.embargo |
N/A |
en_US |
dc.relation.journal |
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery |
en_US |
dc.journal.volume |
16 |
en_US |
dc.journal.issue |
9 |
en_US |
dc.article.pages |
1666-1671 |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Cholangiocarcinoma |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Resection |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Neoadjuvant |
en_US |
dc.keywords |
Adjuvant |
en_US |
dc.identifier.doi |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1935-1 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.ctation |
Glazer, E. S., Liu, P., Abdalla, E. K., Vauthey, J. N., & Curley, S. A. (2012). Neither neoadjuvant nor adjuvant therapy increases survival after biliary tract cancer resection with wide negative margins. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 16(9), 1666-1671. |
en_US |
dc.author.email |
eddie.abdalla@lau.edu.lb |
|
dc.identifier.url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11605-012-1935-1 |
|