.

Extended hepatectomy in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies with and without preoperative portal vein embolization

LAUR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Abdalla, Eddie
dc.contributor.author Barnett, Carlton
dc.contributor.author Doherty, Dorota
dc.contributor.author Curley, Steven
dc.contributor.author Vauthey, Nicolas
dc.date.accessioned 2015-11-10T09:27:08Z
dc.date.available 2015-11-10T09:27:08Z
dc.date.copyright 2002
dc.date.issued 2015-11-10
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10725/2508
dc.description.abstract Hypothesis Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) allows potentially curative hepatic resection without additional morbidity or mortality in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies who are marginal candidates for resection based on small liver remnant size. Design A retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients in a multi-institutional database who underwent extended hepatectomy. Setting University-based referral centers. Patients Forty-two patients underwent preoperative determination of the future liver remnant (FLR) volume before extended hepatectomy (≥5 segments) for hepatobiliary malignancy without chronic underlying liver disease. Patients were stratified by treatment with or without preoperative PVE. Intervention Preoperative percutaneous PVE. Main Outcome Measures Clinical characteristics, FLR volume, operative morbidity, and survival. Results There was no difference between the groups that did and did not undergo PVE for the number of tumors, tumor size, estimated blood loss, duration of the operation, complexity of resection, or surgical margins. The FLR at presentation was significantly smaller in patients who underwent PVE than in patients who did not undergo PVE (18% vs 23%; P<.001). After PVE, FLR volumes increased significantly (P = .003); preoperative FLR volumes were similar in both groups (patients who underwent PVE, 25%; and patients who did not undergo PVE, 23%). There was no perioperative mortality and no statistical difference in the incidence of perioperative complications between those who did and those who did not undergo PVE (5 [28%] of 18 patients vs 5 [21%] of 24 patients). The overall 3-year survival was 65% and the median survival duration was equivalent in the 2 groups (40 vs 52 months for those who did vs those who did not undergo PVE). Conclusion Portal vein embolization enables safe and potentially curative extended hepatectomy in a subset of patients who would otherwise be marginal candidates for resection based on a small liver remnant size. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title Extended hepatectomy in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies with and without preoperative portal vein embolization en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.version N/A en_US
dc.author.school SOM en_US
dc.author.idnumber 201100945 en_US
dc.author.woa N/A en_US
dc.author.department N/A en_US
dc.description.embargo N/A en_US
dc.relation.journal JAMA Surgery en_US
dc.journal.volume 137 en_US
dc.journal.issue 6 en_US
dc.article.pages 675-680 en_US
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.6.675 en_US
dc.identifier.ctation Abdalla, E. K., Barnett, C. C., Doherty, D., Curley, S. A., & Vauthey, J. N. (2002). Extended hepatectomy in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies with and without preoperative portal vein embolization. Archives of Surgery, 137(6), 675-681. en_US
dc.author.email eddie.abdalla@lau.edu.lb
dc.identifier.url http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=212568


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search LAUR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account