.

Students' honesty in evaluating their teachers

LAUR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mattar, D.
dc.contributor.author El Khoury, R.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-09-19T12:22:48Z
dc.date.available 2023-09-19T12:22:48Z
dc.date.copyright 2014 en_US
dc.date.issued 2023-09-19
dc.identifier.isbn 9788461724840 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10725/15054
dc.description.abstract Anonymous students’ evaluations to measure teachers’ performance has become extremely popular in universities around the world and are used to make critical decision with respect to faculty personnel retention, promotion and other. One concern for these evaluations is the likelihood for response bias and the degree of reliability. Although exhaustive studies have been published concerning students’ evaluations, yet, few studies have tackled their honesty. Therefore, this paper aims to find out the extent to which students are serious in filling out this evaluation and to identify the factors discouraging them from being honest. During the 2011-2012 academic year, a questionnaire was distributed to 330 students from different faculties, programs, years and GPAs. The results show that the majority (83.9%) of students are serious when filling out the evaluation forms. By order of relevance, students do not fill the evaluation honestly mainly because (i) they think that their opinions will go unnoticed by the dean; (ii) they are bored from filling out forms, (iii) they do not want to harm the instructor. No significant difference in honesty, while evaluating, is found between students with different genders, different programs (graduate vs. undergraduate) and different GPAs. However, when seniority was highlighted, a significant difference appeared: sophomore students show less frankness in filling the evaluations than junior and senior students. Moreover, senior students have the highest tendency of filling out this assessment tool honestly. When the faculty was taken as a basis for comparison, a significant difference appeared between students enrolled in the Faculty of Sciences and students enrolled in the Faculties of Engineering and Business where Sciences students are the least honest. Furthermore, students suggested that an increase in the reliability of their responses could be achieved through face-to-face private discussions with the Dean or the key person in the office. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher IATED Academy en_US
dc.subject Education -- Congresses en_US
dc.title Students' honesty in evaluating their teachers en_US
dc.type Conference Paper / Proceeding en_US
dc.author.school SOB en_US
dc.author.idnumber 202300031 en_US
dc.author.department Finance And Accounting en_US
dc.publication.place [Valencia, Spain] en_US
dc.keywords Teachers' evaluation en_US
dc.description.bibliographiccitations Includes bibliographical references. en_US
dc.identifier.ctation Mattar, D., & El-Khoury, R. (2014). Students' honesty in evaluating their teachers. In ICERI2014 Proceedings (pp. 4327-4333). IATED. en_US
dc.author.email rim.elkhoury01@lau.edu.lb en_US
dc.conference.date 17-19 November, 2014 en_US
dc.conference.place Seville, Spain en_US
dc.conference.title ICERI 2014 en_US
dc.identifier.tou http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php en_US
dc.identifier.url https://library.iated.org/view/MATTAR2014STU en_US
dc.orcid.id https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4359-7591 en_US
dc.publication.date 2014 en_US
dc.author.affiliation Lebanese American University en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search LAUR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account