.

Effect of structural remodeling (retraction and recoil) of the pipeline embolization device on aneurysm occlusion rate

LAUR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jou, L.-D.
dc.contributor.author Mitchell, B.D.
dc.contributor.author Shaltoni, H.M.
dc.contributor.author Mawad, M.E.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-07-12T08:48:29Z
dc.date.available 2019-07-12T08:48:29Z
dc.date.copyright 2014 en_US
dc.date.issued 2019-07-12
dc.identifier.issn 1936-959X en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10725/11046
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device, an oversized device is often selected to achieve better wall apposition; however, this device oversizing could be related to overelongation and possible delayed enlargement of the stented region. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between oversize and treatment outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DynaCT images of 14 aneurysms treated by a single Pipeline Embolization Device were retrospectively analyzed. 3D images of the deployed device were compared with those acquired at the 6-month follow-up for qualitative and quantitative evaluation. The diameter and length of the Pipeline Embolization Device were measured at both time points and compared for determination of the device changes. RESULTS: Structural changes of the device have been observed, and it was found that the Pipeline Embolization Device influences the vessel curvature in some cases. On average, it increases its diameter by 0.23 mm and decreases its length by 2.88 mm within 6 months of initial deployment. Excessive elongation beyond its nominal length is correlated with a lower aneurysm occlusion rate at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Not only does a Pipeline Embolization Device reconstruct the aneurysm and parent artery, but its entire structure goes through a gradual remodeling process. The relative deformation between the device and the artery indicates suboptimal wall apposition. Device oversizing does not have a direct effect on shortening or recoil. The aneurysm occlusion rate, however, is lowered by overelongation of the Pipeline Embolization Device. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title Effect of structural remodeling (retraction and recoil) of the pipeline embolization device on aneurysm occlusion rate en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.version Published en_US
dc.author.school SOM en_US
dc.author.idnumber 201700518 en_US
dc.author.department N/A en_US
dc.description.embargo N/A en_US
dc.relation.journal American Journal of Neuroradiology en_US
dc.journal.volume 35 en_US
dc.journal.issue 9 en_US
dc.article.pages 1772-1778 en_US
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3920 en_US
dc.identifier.ctation Jou, L. D., Mitchell, B. D., Shaltoni, H. M., & Mawad, M. E. (2014). Effect of structural remodeling (retraction and recoil) of the pipeline embolization device on aneurysm occlusion rate. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 35(9), 1772-1778. en_US
dc.author.email michel.mawad@lau.edu.lb en_US
dc.identifier.tou http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php en_US
dc.identifier.url http://www.ajnr.org/content/35/9/1772.short en_US
dc.author.affiliation Lebanese American University en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search LAUR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account