.

Quantification of error in optical coherence tomography central macular thickness measurement in wet age-related macular degeneration

LAUR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ghazi, Nicola G.
dc.contributor.author Kirk, Tyler
dc.contributor.author Allam, Souha
dc.contributor.author Yan, Guofen
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-13T11:39:54Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-13T11:39:54Z
dc.date.copyright 2009 en_US
dc.date.issued 2019-06-13
dc.identifier.issn 1879-1891 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10725/10808
dc.description.abstract Purpose To assess error indicators encountered during optical coherence tomography (OCT) automated retinal thickness measurement (RTM) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD) before and after bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA) treatment. Design Retrospective observational cross-sectional study. Methods Each of the 6 radial lines of a single Stratus fast macular OCT study before and 3 months following initiation of treatment in 46 eyes with NVAMD, for a total of 552 scans, was evaluated. Error frequency was analyzed relative to the presence of intraretinal, subretinal (SR), and subretinal pigment epithelial (SRPE) fluid. In scans with edge detection kernel (EDK) misplacement, manual caliper measurement of the central macular (CMT) and central foveal (CFT) thicknesses was performed and compared to the software-generated values. The frequency of the various types of error indicators, the risk factors for error, and the magnitude of automated RTM error were analyzed. Results Error indicators were found in 91.3% and 71.7% of eyes before and after treatment, respectively (P = .013). Suboptimal signal strength was the most common error indicator. EDK misplacement was the second most common type of error prior to treatment and the least common after treatment (P = .005). Eyes with SR or SRPE fluid were at the highest risk for error, particularly EDK misplacement (P = .039). There was a strong association between the software-generated and caliper-generated CMT and CFT measurements. The software overestimated measurements by up to 32% and underestimated them by up to 15% in the presence of SR and SRPE fluid, respectively. Conclusions OCT errors are very frequent in NVAMD. SRF is associated with the highest risk and magnitude of error in automated CMT and CFT measurements. Manually adjusted measurements may be more reliable in such eyes. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title Quantification of error in optical coherence tomography central macular thickness measurement in wet age-related macular degeneration en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.version Published en_US
dc.author.school SOM en_US
dc.author.idnumber 201000154 en_US
dc.author.department N/A en_US
dc.description.embargo N/A en_US
dc.relation.journal American Journal of Ophthalmology en_US
dc.journal.volume 48 en_US
dc.journal.issue 1 en_US
dc.article.pages 90-96 en_US
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.02.017 en_US
dc.identifier.ctation Ghazi, N. G., Kirk, T., Allam, S., & Yan, G. (2009). Quantification of error in optical coherence tomography central macular thickness measurement in wet age-related macular degeneration. American journal of ophthalmology, 148(1), 90-96. en_US
dc.author.email nicola.ghazi@lau.edu.lb en_US
dc.identifier.tou http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php en_US
dc.identifier.url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939409001147 en_US
dc.author.affiliation Lebanese American University en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search LAUR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account