.

Effects of left DLPFC versus right PPC tDCS on multiple sclerosis fatigue

LAUR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ahdab, Rechdi
dc.contributor.author Chalah, Moussa A.
dc.contributor.author Riachi, Naji
dc.contributor.author Mhalla, Alaa
dc.contributor.author Abdellaoui, Mohamed
dc.contributor.author Creange, Alain
dc.contributor.author Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal
dc.contributor.author Ayache, Samar S.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-04-10T11:20:53Z
dc.date.available 2019-04-10T11:20:53Z
dc.date.copyright 2017 en_US
dc.date.issued 2019-04-10
dc.identifier.issn 1302-1664 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10725/10399
dc.description.abstract Background and objective Fatigue is a frequent and debilitating symptom in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Its classical treatments are still faced with limited benefits and numerous side effects. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive brain stimulation technique, on such a challenging symptom. Our secondary outcomes included the assessment of tDCS impact on mood and attentional performance. Methods Ten fatigued MS patients were enrolled in a double-blind, sham-controlled, and cross-over study. Each patient randomly received three anodal tDCS blocks: active stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), active stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC), and sham stimulation over either cortical site. Both cortical targets are key components in the MS fatigue networks. The blocks consisted of five consecutive daily sessions and were held apart by a washout interval of three weeks. Results Only active left DLPFC stimulation significantly ameliorated fatigue. Mood improvement was exclusively obtained following active right PPC stimulation. Neither intervention had effects on attention. Conclusion Our study supports the role of anodal tDCS over the left prefrontal in treating MS fatigue. The lack of tDCS effects on attention might be related to the heterogeneity of the studied cohort, the relatively small sample size, the protocol design and duration. Modifying these variables and coupling tDCS with neuroimaging might improve the clinical outcomes and enhance our understanding of the tDCS mechanism of actions. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title Effects of left DLPFC versus right PPC tDCS on multiple sclerosis fatigue en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.version Published en_US
dc.author.school SOM en_US
dc.author.idnumber 201100314 en_US
dc.author.department N/A en_US
dc.description.embargo N/A en_US
dc.relation.journal Journal of Neurological Sciences en_US
dc.journal.volume 372 en_US
dc.article.pages 131-137 en_US
dc.keywords Multiple sclerosis en_US
dc.keywords Transcranial direct current stimulation en_US
dc.keywords Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex en_US
dc.keywords Posterior parietal cortex en_US
dc.keywords Fatigue en_US
dc.keywords Attention en_US
dc.keywords Mood en_US
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.11.015 en_US
dc.identifier.ctation Chalah, M. A., Riachi, N., Ahdab, R., Mhalla, A., Abdellaoui, M., Créange, A., ... & Ayache, S. S. (2017). Effects of left DLPFC versus right PPC tDCS on multiple sclerosis fatigue. Journal of the neurological sciences, 372, 131-137. en_US
dc.author.email rechdi.ahdab@lau.edu.lb en_US
dc.identifier.tou http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php en_US
dc.identifier.url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X16307109#ks0005 en_US
dc.author.affiliation Lebanese American University en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search LAUR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account